Al-Brooks

这个专栏收录什么 本专栏把 MEPA 项目 output 目录中的 113 篇 Ask Al 中英对照资料整理为可独立阅读、搜索和互相跳转的博客文章。资料以 Al Brooks 和 Brooks Trading Course 的 Ask Al 问答为主要来源，内容涵盖价格行为、交易管理、交易心理，也包括交易室问答、访谈、播客、市场评论与课程更新。 每篇都保留原文链接和资料生成时间。你可以从专栏完整目录选一个正在困扰自己的问题开始，也可以使用博客的搜索页按英文术语或中文关键词查找。 为什么用问答的方式阅读 这些材料的组织单位是问题：突破后应该持有还是退出？回调时如何判断入场？亏损之后怎样处理下一笔交易？它们适合围绕具体疑问查阅，再回到原始语境核对条件。 专栏保留英文段落与中文译文的对应关系。阅读中文可以帮助理解大意；遇到概率、止损、仓位和交易风格等容易因翻译产生歧义的词，应同时查看英文和原站。文中的第一人称通常属于原文说话者，并非本站作者的个人经历。 可以怎样开始 先看行情，再看入场 从突破、回调入场和交易区间开始，关注一个观点适用于哪种行情背景。不要把某个问答中的局部结论直接套用到所有市场。 把风险和管理放在一起 结合每笔承担多少风险、仓位管理和止损与加仓阅读，记录原文的前提、使用的单位和产品背景。 区分交易风格 剥头皮与波段、波段交易的定义与 Always In 相关材料讨论不同的持仓思路。相同术语在不同上下文中可能承担不同作用，适合并排比较。 遇到执行困难时回到心理主题 处理亏损交易、报复性交易和信心、错误与恐惧可以作为复盘时的问题清单。区分“读懂一个观点”与“能够稳定执行”，也区分叙述中的个人经验与普遍事实。 如何把阅读变成笔记 每次只选一个问题，留下四条记录：原文讨论的场景是什么；观点成立需要什么条件；哪些条件尚不清楚；下次复盘要观察什么。若需要核对细节，直接打开该篇顶部的原文链接。 市场评论与旧访谈应带着当时的时间背景阅读。本站的收录日期、资料生成时间和原文事件时间是三件不同的事，不能互相替代。 来源与校对说明 本次收录基于 MEPA 现有的中英对照输出，不表示已对全部译文逐句校对。导入时清理了 11 处明显的翻译工具提示语，原始文件快照与清理记录保留在仓库中；其他正文没有进行观点改写。后续发现误译，应结合原文修订并留下可追踪记录。 原文及其观点归原作者和原站所有，本站不是 Brooks Trading Course 官方站点。原文链接用于核对来源，不表示原作者认可本站译文。这里整理的是学习资料，具体交易描述带有各自的市场和历史背景，不构成针对读者个人情况的投资建议。 进入专栏，浏览全部资料 →

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/how-many-points-to-risk-per-trade/ 生成时间: 2026-08-28 15:28 Video duration: 7min 6sec 视频时长：7分6秒 Trading room Q&A Wednesday May 19, 2021 交易室问答 2021年5月19日 星期三 Q: I’m consistently messing up with good high probability trades with bad stop and bad risk/reward management. Other than recommended no more than 1%, is there a usual number of points I ought to risk for a trade for the Emini or the Micro Emini? Can you suggest a number of points for me? ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/swing-traders-staying-always-in/ 生成时间: 2026-09-04 15:28 BPA trading room Q&A: November 20, 2015 BPA 交易室问答：2015年11月20日 Any advice for a swing trader who wants to stay with the Always In direction until the Always In clearly changes how they do this today? 对于波段交易者来说，如果他们希望在「始终持仓」方向保持不变直到该方向明确改变，他们今天该如何做？有什么建议吗？ Video duration: 4min 24sec 视频时长：4分24秒 You can also view this video on Al’s YouTube Channel if needed. 如有需要，你也可以在 Al 的 YouTube 频道上观看此视频。 Video transcript—Swing traders staying Always In 视频文字稿——波段交易者保持「始终持仓」 Two ways to handle Always In 处理「始终持仓」的两种方法 Yeah, I just talked about Always In. In general, there are two ways to handle Always In . You take every logical reversal or you only take the really strong reversals, so you can either buy above 1 or buy the 2 close. I think the bulls get out below 11. Some bears short below 11, other bears wait and they short either below 24 or maybe the 28 close. That’s getting pretty late. ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/advice-on-2nd-leg-traps/ 生成时间: 2026-09-01 16:59 BPA trading room Q&A: November 18, 2015 BPA交易室问答：2015年11月18日 Do you have any advice on how to look for second leg traps? For example, bar 20 to 22 could be a second leg trap. Video duration: 3min 4sec 关于如何寻找第二腿陷阱，你有什么建议吗？例如，20到22号K线可能是一个第二腿陷阱。视频时长：3分4秒 You can also view this video on Al’s YouTube Channel if needed. 如有需要，你也可以在Al的YouTube频道上观看此视频。 Video transcript — Any advice on 2nd leg traps 视频文字稿——关于第二腿陷阱的建议 A reasonable short trade 一笔合理的空头交易 [Bars] 20 to 22? Yeah, it’s possible. At that point in the day — at that point in the day, right here, we’re at the top of yesterday’s range. We obviously have a trading range. We’re probably in breakout mode. We’re probably going to double the range either by going up or by going down. We have room to the 60-minute moving average and to yesterday’s close so we can easily go down. And I thought it was a reasonable short. But with 20, 21 closing on their highest, I thought more likely the best the bears would get would be sideways. ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/52-traders-al-brooks-podcast/ 生成时间: 2026-09-04 14:16 Dominating price action, probability, and where to buy vs sell 掌控价格行为、概率，以及在哪里做多与做空 A podcast special event this week with Al Brooks by Cam Hawkins of the 52 Traders website. Podcast was first published on July 13, 2016, and replicated here with the kind permission of the producer Cam. 本周的播客特别节目，由 52 Traders 网站的 Cam Hawkins 与 Al Brooks 对话。该播客最初于 2016 年 7 月 13 日发布，经制作人 Cam 的友好许可在此转载。 ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/always-in-major-trend-reversal-analysis/ 生成时间: 2026-09-04 14:16 Always In and Major Trend Reversal trading setups BPA trading room Q&A: November 6, 2015 始终持仓策略与主要趋势反转交易模式——BPA交易室问答：2015年11月6日 Question: Could you give your perspective on the day for Always In trading and Major Trend Reversals? Video duration: 2min 33sec 问题：你能谈谈对“始终持仓交易”和“主要趋势反转”这一天的看法吗？视频时长：2分33秒 You can also view this video on Al’s YouTube Channel if needed. 如果需要，您也可以在 Al 的 YouTube 频道观看此视频。 Always In trading 始终持仓交易 From an Always In perspective today. Okay, maybe — I think it’s an okay swing short below B3. I think you sell either B4 or B5, and you get out above B8, and you get long above B12 or you wait for the B14, B15 close. I would get out below B16. If not below B16, then above B19. And I think you buy again above B24. And then you notice bad sell signals — B29 and B33 — so theoretically you could still stay long, stop below B24 or below B12 or below B8. To me, double top up here, trading range. If I bought above B24, I would get out below B24. And I’m not selling down here [B36-39], I’m buying again here [B39], and I probably would get out there [B56] or on the third bear bar [B59]. Or go short and then buy again above B63 or wait for three or four consecutive bull bars and then buy. ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/always-in-trading-and-breakout-scalps/ 生成时间: 2026-09-04 15:02 BPA trading room Q&A: June 17, 2015 BPA 交易室问答：2015 年 6 月 17 日 As a strict Always In trader, I got chewed up today, should I have assumed that the day was overall Always In Long and just stayed long with the stop below 16 or 22 until it clearly went Always In Short. How does a strict Always In trader trade today? ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/always-in-trading-less-stress/ 生成时间: 2026-09-01 16:40 Always In trading too stressful? BPA trading room Q&A: August 10, 2015 始终持仓交易太有压力？BPA交易室问答：2015年8月10日 Do you have any ideas on how to make “Always In” trading less stressful or less strainful? Video duration: 2min 55sec 你有什么方法可以让“始终持仓”交易变得不那么紧张或不那么有压力吗？视频时长：2分55秒 You can also view this video on Al’s YouTube Channel if needed. 如有需要，你也可以在 Al 的 YouTube 频道上观看此视频。 Always In — Two ways to lower stress 始终持仓——降低压力的两种方法 Not really. I have two comments about that. One is trade so small that you do not care. You trade the “do not care” size and you do not get rich trading “do not care,” but you get very good practice. You have money on the line, and I think that always affects how you trade, and that’s important. So it’s a cheap way to get good experience trading. ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/automated-trading-and-emotions/ 生成时间: 2026-09-04 15:16 BPA trading room Q&A: May 6, 2015 BPA 交易室问答：2015年5月6日 I’m sure that you looked at automated trading in your long experience. What are your thoughts on automated trading for small volume retail traders, especially for those who cannot usually control emotions? Audio duration: 3min 55sec 我相信你在长期的交易经验中研究过自动化交易。你对小额零售交易者使用自动化交易有什么看法，尤其是那些通常无法控制情绪的交易者？ 音频时长：3分55秒 Audio transcript 音频文字记录 Sell! Sell Now! No! No! Buy! Buy! Sell! 卖！现在就卖！不！不！买！买！卖！ I think traders using automated trading are going to lose. My experience is I spent – I don’t know – more than 10,000 hours testing all kinds of trading ideas, and I spent a whole bunch of time trying automated trading, and for me, I kept seeing exceptions to every rule. So I’d write systems, and as I’m getting triggered into a trade, I’m looking at it and I’m saying, “Wait a minute, that bear bar is bigger than I think it should be. I should not buy here.” Or the signal bar – although it’s a signal bar, it’s small relative to the past three bear bars. So I kept overriding the system and I ended up concluding that my personality is not good for automated trading. ...

本文为 MEPA 导入的中英对照学习资料，原文归原作者及原站所有；中文译文尚未逐篇校对。页面日期为本站收录日期，原资料生成时间不代表原文发布日期。 专栏导读 · 完整目录 · 原文 原文链接: https://www.brookstradingcourse.com/ask-al/backtesting/ 生成时间: 2026-09-04 15:01 BPA trading room Q&A: March 17, 2015 BPA交易室问答：2015年3月17日 An article said backtesting is the first step to becoming a profitable trader. Do you agree with this and how do you advise a beginning trader to start? 有文章说回测是成为盈利交易者的第一步。你同意这种说法吗？你会怎样建议新手交易者起步？ Audio duration: 6min 9sec 音频时长：6分9秒 Audio transcript 音频文字稿 Backtesting is more complex than traders think 回测比交易者想象的要复杂得多 Every now and then, somebody brings up backtesting, and I can talk for hours about backtesting, and I think that advice is horrible advice because, backtesting is far more complicated than what most traders who backtest understand. There’s really a lot of math in backtesting, and there are all kinds of assumptions. Let me just say that most people who are backtesting and coming up with results, like in TradeStation, and they’re coming up with all these profitable strategies, are fooling themselves. They’re not intentionally fooling themselves, but they don’t understand what they are doing. They think they understand what they are doing. They’re creating stuff that just looks exactly like what TradeStation says, or any other, E-signal or anything else, MetaTrader; it doesn’t matter which one. But you will lose money if you backtest ideas and trade those ideas. You will lose money because backtesting is much more mathematically rigorous than what it appears. ...